Implementation and analysis of Babesia immunoassay testing

Показати скорочений опис матеріалу

dc.contributor.author Pokhil, S. I. en
dc.contributor.author Bondarenko, A. V. en
dc.contributor.author Bocharova, T. V. en
dc.contributor.author Lepilina, K. M. en
dc.contributor.author Lytvynenko, M. V. en
dc.contributor.author Gargin, V. V. en
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-30T06:46:10Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-30T06:46:10Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Implementation and analysis of Babesia immunoassay testing / S. I. Pokhil, A. V. Bondarenko, T. V. Bocharova et al. // Pol Med J. 2020. Vol 48, N 285. P. 170–173. en
dc.identifier.uri https://repo.odmu.edu.ua:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/7671
dc.description.abstract Lifelong withdrawal from the donor population of those who have been diagnosed with babesiosis must be used for transmission prevention. The aim of the study was a detection of Babesia antibodies level with the usage of experimental Babesia divergens whole-cell slide antigen and commercial B. microti immunofluorescence assay substrate slide (Fuller Laboratories, USA). Methods. Experimental B. divergens whole-cell slide antigen in addition to commercial B. microti IFA substrate slide was used to create a diagnostic kit for serum Babesia antibodies level detecting, as well as for a babesiosis serodiagnosis clinical trial of different origins blood samples (patients with Lyme disease, rheumatoid arthritis and toxoplasmosis; human blood donors; cattle). Results. Antibodies to B. divergens (5.4%) and B. microti (2.3%) were detected with higher (p <0.05) frequency at Lyme disease patients (16.7%) than at blood donors (1.7%). Diagnostically significant IgG titres (= 1:128) were found in 13.3% of blood samples from Lyme disease patients and 1.7% from blood donors. Specific IgM were also found in 13.3% blood samples from Lyme disease patients. Among blood samples from Lyme disease patients, in which diagnostically significant titres of Babesia antibodies were detected (16.7%), 60% of them were represented by IgG and IgM (rA= 0.63), and in 40% only one of them reached diagnostically significant titre. Conclusions. Advantages of babesiosis IFA diagnostics are combined with its significant disadvantages (principle of evaluation, low sensitivity in the initial period of the disease, probability of false positives, absence of validated test systems and research protocols for B. divergens and B. divergens-like species). en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Babesia en
dc.subject IgG en
dc.subject IgM en
dc.subject immunofluorescence assay en
dc.subject Lyme disease en
dc.title Implementation and analysis of Babesia immunoassay testing en
dc.type Article en


Долучені файли

Даний матеріал зустрічається у наступних зібраннях

Показати скорочений опис матеріалу