Utility of low- frequency piezoelectric thromboelastography (LPTEG) for comparison of mono- and combined antithrombotic therapy results in patients with morbid obesity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tarabrin, O.
dc.contributor.author Sukhonos, R.
dc.contributor.author Suslov, O.
dc.contributor.author Volodychev, D.
dc.contributor.author Vorotyntsev, S.
dc.contributor.author Tarabrin, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-15T09:19:34Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-15T09:19:34Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Utility of low- frequency piezoelectric thromboelastography (LPTEG) for comparison of mono- and combined antithrombotic therapy results in patients with morbid obesity / O. Tarabrin, R. Sukhonos, O. Suslov et al. // Critical Care. 2019. N 23. P. 145–147. uk_UA
dc.identifier.uri https://repo.odmu.edu.ua:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/7342
dc.description.abstract Patients with morbid obesity (MO) have a high risk of thromboembolic events. In patients with a BMI >35, the hypercoagulable state is due to impairment of all parts of the blood coagulation as well as anticoagulation mechanisms by obesity. Combined therapy of thromboembolic complications in patients with obesity Sodium Enoxaparin sodium and Pentoxifylline is more effective than Enoxaparin sodium monotherapy because it affects all parts of the hemostatic system. uk_UA
dc.language.iso en uk_UA
dc.subject utility of low- frequency piezoelectric thromboelastography (LPTEG) uk_UA
dc.subject mono- and combined antithrombotic therapy results uk_UA
dc.subject morbid obesity uk_UA
dc.subject combined therapy uk_UA
dc.title Utility of low- frequency piezoelectric thromboelastography (LPTEG) for comparison of mono- and combined antithrombotic therapy results in patients with morbid obesity uk_UA
dc.type Article uk_UA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account